m
New Recruit
Posts: 0
|
Post by m on Apr 23, 2008 6:51:52 GMT -5
i would argue, quite rightly i think... that Britney Spears is the closest thing we have now to a Kurt Cobain. she is also the closest thing we have to a Michael Jackson minus the scary 'child bedsharing' stuff. her genius knows no bounds, clearly. she is a huge star. she is hounded and harassed by the media. she is struggling to cope with the pressures of fame. she has just released her best album and while promoting it her personal life is in absolute freefall. she has well-publicised issues with mental-health and substance abuse. she has an, err.. 'unhelpful' partner, and is in a volatile relationship. im picturing Cobain when he was dying his hair different colours, hacking loads of it off... sick of the 'grunge' tag, sick of expectations.. the original title of Radio Friendly Unit Shifter was Nine Month Media Blackout. Britney's new album, while she is the most photographed person in the history of the world, ever... is Blackout. of course they're from totally different backgrounds and totally different genres. i recognise that. that's the thing that none of you can get past. but even if you dont like her, you must surely see the parallels? on a side note- fuck, i cant believe that when i say positive things about her, you people pull out pictures of her looking bad to take the piss out of her. how many bad pics exist of all of you/us? if i had a million pics a day taken of me, by 50-100 people surrounding me from all angles, id expect a few to look bad.. especially if i was in the middle of a mental breakdown and popping to the shop to get some cigarettes or whatever. Jeez. when people see pics of her looking good, they go on about her being photoshopped and plastered in make-up.. so what? if your best friend, a mother of 2, wasnt looking her best, and then got a present of a nice photoshoot somewhere, you'd be happy for her when you saw her looking good in the pics, especially when people are constantly belittling and abusing her appearance. you are mean people. and you know it. cobain was our greatest 'rock star'. britney is our greatest 'pop star'. character, controversy, music.. everything. ..and isnt she singlehandedly trying to keep the US economy going? www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2008/02/02/wbritney302.xml
|
|
|
Post by breakerfall on Apr 23, 2008 6:57:21 GMT -5
I would just like to say that is possibly my most favourite thread title ever.........
(this is meant in no way detrimental to Ms Spears, thankyou)
|
|
|
Post by gr0undzer0 on Apr 23, 2008 6:57:47 GMT -5
word
|
|
m
New Recruit
Posts: 0
|
Post by m on Apr 23, 2008 7:17:54 GMT -5
I would just like to say that is possibly my most favourite thread title ever......... that's what im here for.
|
|
|
Post by LostCause on Apr 23, 2008 7:24:43 GMT -5
To be determined and of course you have a "nice" picture of her on your avatar.
Don't forget that Kurt also had a nice and healthy gun collection that was pretty well known.
|
|
m
New Recruit
Posts: 0
|
Post by m on Apr 23, 2008 7:37:26 GMT -5
To be determined and of course you have a "nice" picture of her on your avatar. i think it's a nice pic of her. it's a punk rock moment. it is a young woman throwing off the shackles of her image. it is a healthy self-destruction of all expectations and a 'fuck you' to her record company, management and those who would choose to exploit her appearance to sell her as a commodity just before she has to be in tip-top shape and looking incredible to promote an album. (in rock terms, it's the equivalent of Nirvana getting Albini to record the follow-up to their big pop-rock hit album). in an age of media saturation, with a million channels of whatever you want whenever you want it... in an age of faceless perfection in pop... in an age of meaningless drivel in popular new rock culture... she is, truly, a saviour. she is a voice of common failings, imperfections and mistakes.. in much the same way that Cobain reached out and screamed the insecurities, fears and anger of millions of young people at the start of the 90's. Use just once and destroy Invasion of our piracy Afterbirth of a nation Starve without your skeleton key
I love you for what I am not I did not want what I have got A blanket acne'ed with cigarette burns Speak at once while taking turns
What is what i need? What is wrong with me? What is what i need?
It's nothing to do with what you think If you ever think at all Bi-polar opposites attract All of a sudden my waters broke
I love you for what I am not I do not want what I have got A blanket acne'ed with cigarette burns Second-rate third degree burns
what is what i need What is wrong with me What do I think I think
Hate your enemies Save, save your friends Find, find your place Speak, speak the truth.
|
|
m
New Recruit
Posts: 0
|
Post by m on Apr 23, 2008 7:51:43 GMT -5
picture britney with shaved head, wandering around with or without an awful wig and wearing tatty old clothes..
and now think what 'grunge' was about.. a disregard and dislike for the preened rock stars of the day.
i love her. she was not meant for a world like this.
|
|
|
Post by Shoesh on Apr 23, 2008 7:54:49 GMT -5
"she was not meant for a world like this."
I agree. Now make her go away. m, you seem to have lost your mind. Maybe as a tribute to your britney, who knows. She looks quite insane in your avatar.
Now I'm going to ignore this thread.
|
|
m
New Recruit
Posts: 0
|
Post by m on Apr 23, 2008 8:18:42 GMT -5
"she was not meant for a world like this." I agree. Now make her go away. m, you seem to have lost your mind. Maybe as a tribute to your britney, who knows. She looks quite insane in your avatar. Now I'm going to ignore this thread. are you in a mood with me..? eye fink u r. xx
|
|
|
Post by pie2pie on Apr 23, 2008 8:28:56 GMT -5
I agree entirely with mokkz.
I once compared the Backstreet Boys with Elvis Presley (this was 10 years ago probably). I like the Britney/Kurt comparison.
|
|
|
Post by breakerfall on Apr 23, 2008 8:37:08 GMT -5
Mokkly's argument raises some quite interesting points really. Any issues I may have with her music or situation have bever been directed at her personally. I actually find her life to have been quite tragic and sad
and its not like Mokkly said I just wanna bang a young lady in a school uniform who looks like she wants to fellate EVERYTHING ;D
|
|
|
Post by manintheshadows on Apr 23, 2008 8:45:56 GMT -5
Nice pic of Mick Miller you have as an av there, m
|
|
|
Post by Beaty on Apr 23, 2008 8:46:28 GMT -5
A part of me really loves Britney. I mean, I became a fan when I was 10 and it lasted until I was about 12.
And then...oh the irony...I became a Nirvana fan.
Britney is punk-rock. She's not the best singer in the world, but I think she's a good entertainer. And she's real. Now. She's fucked-up and she knows it.
ROCK ON BRITNEY!!!! But please put on some panties ...
|
|
|
Post by Stephanie on Apr 23, 2008 8:55:26 GMT -5
I think you draw out interesting similarities between the two, but, though it may be obvious, I think it bears stating that Kurt was more intelligent, insightful, and creatively gifted than Britney. Which gave him the capacity to really stand outside of his own condition, and in some cases, the world's, and look in. That is what is so haunting about his music.
Britney, on the other hand, seems to me to be simply caught in a blind reaction to her circumstances, in which others are trying to place her into a role into which she clearly does not fit. Her reactions provide an interesting commentary on her personal condition and a lot of larger social conditions, but how self-aware is she, really?
That element of awareness is what elevates a person's story from the pathetic to the tragic, and it is what I find informs the most compelling art. Does Britney have the capacity to become more self-aware? Perhaps, but even so, I have my doubts she will ever come into her own power like many strong women in the pop and rock world. I'd love for her to prove me wrong, but I find her much less interesting than, say, a woman like Courtney Love, who, love her or hate her, knows how to locate her own power and use it.
Back to Kurt... Another difference is, one gets the sense from things that Kurt said and wrote that he realized that there was ultimately nothing and no one to rebel against. Britney is still caught in the mindset that she is rebelling against something, like an adolescent rebelling against her parents. There is a depth of despair that can be reached when one realizes there is nothing to fight against that simply cannot be reached when one has a mental image that one is fighting against some truly existing, larger entity, whether that be a government conspiracy, larger than life parents, or whatever else. Kurt seemed to stand alone, and know it, in a way Britney does not.
I feel for Britney, I admire and cheer on her rebellion, and I think she has potential to become an even more interesting artist and person if she continues to survive. But I cannot deny the obvious lack of depth to her when she is compared to someone who had gifts and capacities that she plainly does not.
|
|
|
Post by Stephanie on Apr 23, 2008 8:56:34 GMT -5
Britney is punk-rock. She's not the best singer in the world, but I think she's a good entertainer. And she's real. Now. She's fucked-up and she knows it. That I agree with. ROCK ON BRITNEY!!!! But please put on some panties ... And that as well...
|
|
m
New Recruit
Posts: 0
|
Post by m on Apr 23, 2008 9:08:38 GMT -5
I think you draw out interesting similarities between the two, but, though it may be obvious, I think it bears stating that Kurt was more intelligent, insightful, and creatively gifted than Britney. Which gave him the capacity to really stand outside of his own condition, and in some cases, the world's, and look in. That is what is so haunting about his music. well, all of that is a given, obviously. but that is the difference between rock and pop, which i already stated. and quite honestly, i dont think anyone since Kurt has hit that depth and clarity in rock music, let alone in pop music. Britney, on the other hand, seems to me to be simply caught in a blind reaction to her circumstances, in which others are trying to place her into a role into which she clearly does not fit. Her reactions provide an interesting commentary on her personal condition and a lot of larger social conditions, but how self-aware is she, really? i think she is hugely self-aware. she has a lifetime of being in the public eye, and a lifetime of media-training which has clearly turned her back on. That element of awareness is what elevates a person's story from the pathetic to the tragic, and it is what I find informs the most compelling art. Does Britney have the capacity to become more self-aware? Perhaps, but even so, I have my doubts she will ever come into her own power like many strong women in the pop and rock world. I'd love for her to prove me wrong, but I find her much less interesting than, say, a woman like Courtney Love, who, love her or hate her, knows how to locate her own power and use it. i disagree about the Courtney thing. she is a bit of a puppet, and not remotely creative (im thinking- albums helmed/arranged/co-written by Kim Deal, Kurt Cobain, Billy Corgan, Linda Perry). she is, like Britney, primarily a crowd-pleasing performer who gets people in to do the groundwork. Back to Kurt... Another difference is, one gets the sense from things that Kurt said and wrote that he realized that there was ultimately nothing and no one to rebel against. Britney is still caught in the mindset that she is rebelling against something, like an adolescent rebelling against her parents. There is a depth of despair that can be reached when one realizes there is nothing to fight against that simply cannot be reached when one has a mental image that one is fighting against some truly existing, larger entity, whether that be a government conspiracy, larger than life parents, or whatever else. Kurt seemed to stand alone, and know it, in a way Britney does not. i disgree again on some of that. but i dont have time to explain why right now as im going to the cinema. I feel for Britney, I admire and cheer on her rebellion, and I think she has potential to become an even more interesting artist and person if she continues to survive. But I cannot deny the obvious lack of depth to her when she is compared to someone who had gifts and capacities that she plainly does not. of course she has depth. i think you're underestimating what it takes to be a child star and to leave all that behind. to be a mother without her children. to love someone who is ultimately destroying you personally and professionally. perhaps a Marilyn Monroe comparison is more the order of the day... but who here would've bothered to read that and listen to me spouting opinions..? for effect, and for the 'music star in freefall' comparison, this was my best option. does anyone want to hear about how the Beatles recorded and arranged Strawberry Fields Forever....?
|
|
|
Post by dimples... on Apr 23, 2008 9:12:33 GMT -5
I fear if I read this my thought process may be forever corrupted...so i'm just not...
|
|
|
Post by gr0undzer0 on Apr 23, 2008 9:24:26 GMT -5
i cant believe this thread has reached 2 pages
|
|
|
Post by pie2pie on Apr 23, 2008 11:09:26 GMT -5
well maybe you should lock it, just like oyu lock everything else.
...kidding, kidding.
|
|
|
Post by ShotByTheBlues on Apr 23, 2008 13:08:19 GMT -5
Just dont make me listen to the crap and im fine with whatever she does, if she has Jesus's love child or cuts her hair.
|
|
m
New Recruit
Posts: 0
|
Post by m on Apr 23, 2008 15:50:16 GMT -5
i cant believe this thread has reached 2 pages believe.
|
|
|
Post by rominibikini on Apr 23, 2008 16:10:00 GMT -5
do you believe in life after love?
|
|
m
New Recruit
Posts: 0
|
Post by m on Apr 23, 2008 16:18:01 GMT -5
do you believe in life after love? nope. not a Cher fan. just Britney for me, in the female pop star stakes.
|
|
|
Post by ShotByTheBlues on Apr 23, 2008 16:43:27 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by MR GUMBY on Apr 23, 2008 18:44:15 GMT -5
who the fuck is this mokkly person?
|
|